fluoride

The American Dental Association (ADA) has long been a leading voice in promoting fluoride as a cornerstone of public dental health policy. However, in light of recent scientific developments, the organization's unyielding stance on fluoride is raising serious concerns. This is especially true regarding the ADA's disregard for decades of scientific studies presented during the federal lawsuit against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concerning fluoride added to community drinking water.

Ten significant studies have explored the adverse effects of fluoride, bringing attention to the precautionary principle in public health policy. This article delves into these findings, contrasts them with responses from the American Dental Association (ADA), and discusses the challenges in changing public health policies due to vested interests.

Recent findings from two significant studies have reignited the fluoride debate, suggesting that the dental benefits of fluoridated water are minimal at best.

This article reviews the findings of a recent study by Drs. Bill Osmunson and Griffin Cole, which provides a comprehensive analysis of the economic cost, benefits, and risks associated with Community Water Fluoridation (CWF).